Zombies among us

Somewhere there’s got to be a Ph.D. dissertation on how each society imagines monsters that suit their time and place. Ancient Anglo-Saxons had ugly monsters that broke into their fortresses at night, the church-dominated Dark Ages had its share of witches and demons, the Industrial Revolution had Frankenstein embodying the dangers of technology, to be substituted by Dracula, an aristocratic vampire from a backwards land threatening the order and progress achieved.

I think the monster for our times is the zombie [1]. Or rather, the zombies in the plural -since their power lies in their numbers. They are the dark angle of that attention-grabbing issue of Time magazine giving us all the Person of the Year award: The zombies are us. We, as a group, are the horde that chews up the Earth’s resources, that demands dumbing down our culture, that swarms shopping malls, and that instantly carries viruses from the other end of the world. Individuals that wake up to this reality may fight back for a while, but sooner or later will be bitten and infected as well, joining the ranks of the mindless mass and looking for other fresh brains to spoil. The ultimate menace of this monster is the extinction of free will: each individual becoming part of the crowd that aimlessly wanders through the streets, or sits in front of the TV, with the brain switched off.

Lately it’s been a great time for fans of the zombie concept, for two reasons: First, the fabulous zombie-infestation videogame, Dead Rising, has more social commentary episodes seamlessly embedded than any other videogame I can recall. And second, there’s two recent books by Max Brooks that push the genre to fascinating and fun new areas. In The Zombie Survival Guide, he describes in excrutiating detail how to defend yourself, attack, and survive a zombie outbreak. He’s clearly been thinking about this a lot (first thing to do to defend your home from a zombie infestation? fill your bathtub with water! you don’t know when the water system will shut down and weeks from now your greatest enemy will be thirst, not the living dead!). It’s a great combination of dark humour, horror, strategic thinking, and straight-faced presentation. Required reading to survive the incoming outbreak.

I have mixed feelings about the second book, World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War. It consists of a series of interviews with people all over the world recounting the recent, massive zombie outbreak that nearly destroyed us (you remember it, don’t you?), and their efforts to prevail ever since. The book’s first half –the actual outbreak and crumbling down of our civilization– is absolutely absorbing, powerfully emotional. But then something goes off in the second half –when humans fight back–, when the narrative becomes too militaristic and formulaic: Long descriptions of weapons and ammo, the President of the United States is the world’s hero, every episode ends with a cliche. The book was not bad, but given the promise of the first half I finished feeling dissatisfied and thinking of what it could have been. The good news is that the book’s movie is coming up in 2008 (produced by Brad Pitt’s film company, apparently). If they keep the mockumentary format, and the pace of the first half of the book, it’s going to be a classic.

[1] Runner-ups: Robots and aliens. But it’s very difficult to achieve a good narrative with artificial intelligence elements, and I can’t possibly get frightened at a group of monsters that includes E.T. and ewoks.

About Jorge Aranda

I'm currently a Postdoctoral Fellow at the SEGAL and CHISEL labs in the Department of Computer Science of the University of Victoria.
This entry was posted in Books, Off Topic. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Zombies among us

  1. jj says:

    hola mundo, chevere esos zombies

  2. I still have nightmares remembering the $5.00 I spent renting “Shaun of the Dead”… Seriously, I recently posted a comment very similar about the real power of the media; analyzing the phenomena of ‘uncovering a lie/conspiracy/big government screw up’ and people not giving a darn about it. I didn’t think of us as Zombies at that time but now I am sure we all are, a little, some times.
    By the way, Time Magazine makes a poll every year to choose the Man of the Year. The award to ‘YOU’ came because the polls aimed to… Hugo Chávez.

  3. leo says:

    Manuel, I am interested in knowing your source for the Hugo Chávez remark. I don’t think Hugo could have beaten even lonelygirl15 (since they decided to include concepts now…) but I will keep an open mind until I see the source.
    And about the “YOU” award, I find it stupid at its best. Not only is “YOU” just a concept. Now that Time has included us (“YOU”) in the category I don’t see a reason for us (“YOU”) to keep winning this award every single year – except, of course, “THEY” have a better year.
    Oh, yeah, and Zombies are the best.

  4. Jorge says:

    Be vigilant – “THEY” might always make a comeback!🙂

    Frankly, if the Person of the Year award is ever decided with a poll, I’m pretty sure Stephen Colbert would win it.

  5. People like to know the source like I am doing a PhD dissertation… Anyway, the source is Time Magazine itself:
    http://www.time.com/time/personoftheyear/2006/walkup/
    They removed the link (rubbish) but you can still see it as February the first. I took a snapshot of the screen just in case.
    We can reach two conclusions: Time Magazine is just another tool of the Evil Empire and too many zombies have access to computers and polls. THEY are among us…

  6. Jorge says:

    Holy smokes Manuel, you were right!

    I don’t think the web poll carries any real weight, but Chavez definitely was in the lead for quite a large margin.

    Interesting that Time ignored the say of the people to which it gave the award.

  7. leo says:

    Well, you were right about Hugo Chávez being ahead in this poll. Surprising and, in my opinion, undeserved. You are wrong, however, in assuming that whoever had came first in the poll was going to be named “Person of the year.” I see no evil in TIME’s selection. Just lack of brains.
    But thanks for posting the link. It just sounded like you were making it up.

  8. Jorge says:

    It’s often like that with Manuel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s