Journals and Conferences

I was not aware of Lance Fortnow’s viewpoint article on journal vs. conference publishing in Computer Science until Neil Ernst brought it up recently, and I’m glad I’m not the only one that thinks the primacy of conferences in our field is a problem.

For a while, during my first few years as a grad student, I even assumed that the conference model for dissemination of results was the norm across the sciences, and had found it quite strange: one submits a year’s worth of work, or more, to the premier conference in one’s field, to be accepted or rejected on what often seems to be an arbitrary basis and without even the ability to retort to the reviewers’ comments (ICSE, the main conference in my field, has a reputation of being a “crap shoot”; at least it now allows for author responses). Later I learned that the rest of the scientific world doesn’t work like that, and I still haven’t found a convincing reason for this eccentricity in Computer Science.

I’ve been lucky with my submissions so far, so I don’t complain about the conference model out of spite (maybe out of fear, as I know my luck is bound to change at some point). But it’s weird that I’m now on the final stretch of my Ph.D., with what I think is a decent publication record, and haven’t even attempted publishing in a journal yet. To be honest I don’t know why I haven’t done it —journals don’t have annoyingly hard page limits or deadlines, and they have better and more careful peer review processes. Conferences do allow us to meet and catch up with the people in our community, and we certainly need some, but we don’t need them to be as crucial to everyone’s careers, nor do we need so many of them. Not that I am yet in a position to do anything about it but to focus on publishing more on journals than on conferences myself.

About Jorge Aranda

I'm currently a Postdoctoral Fellow at the SEGAL and CHISEL labs in the Department of Computer Science of the University of Victoria.
This entry was posted in Academia. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Journals and Conferences

  1. Neil says:

    Luck plays a part but I think you also have a great ability to pick interesting topics and then (most importantly I feel) follow through with them.

    I guess the question is, would a journal submission just be a longer version of a paper? This seems to be our model — often “selected” from conferences. To me this approach relegates journals to the role of archive or appendix.

    • Jorge says:

      Thanks Neil. I think you’re right –for CS, journals are almost like an archive, conferences play much of the role of journals, and workshops play the role of conferences.

  2. Dan says:

    I completely agree. Except the opposite. At my university, journals are the only thing that matters. I have only recently learned of the conference vs. journal argument. For me it boils down to two issues:
    1) Conferences do not allow enough space for a complete paper
    2) Travel is too expensive

    BTW: Your advisor helped me with LaTeX issues at ESEM last year. Tell him thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s